Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the High Court could condone delay in filing the sales tax application under section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 by applying section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Analysis: The time limits under section 61, read with sections 59 and 60 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, were held to be part of a special limitation scheme. Section 59 permits only sections 4 and 12 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to apply in computing the periods under sections 55, 57 and 61, while section 60 separately confers a limited power to condone delay only in appeals under section 55. On a conjoint reading of the statutory scheme, the legislative intent was found to exclude section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 from proceedings under section 61. The earlier Division Bench decision in N.H. Polymers was followed as binding precedent.
Conclusion: The High Court had no power to condone the delay in filing the sales tax applications.
Final Conclusion: The motions seeking condonation of delay failed and were dismissed, leaving the statutory time bar under section 61 intact.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a special fiscal statute prescribes a limitation period and the statutory scheme permits only limited computation exclusions, the court cannot invoke section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 unless the special law expressly or by necessary implication permits such condonation.