Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether any referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's order holding that the amount received on sale of cut and sold rubber trees was liable to capital gains tax and, consequently, whether a direction for reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was warranted.
Analysis: Old and unyielding rubber trees were held to be a capital asset, and the sale proceeds from trees cut and sold by the assessee were treated as chargeable to capital gains. The matter was found to be settled by binding decisions, leaving no debatable legal question arising from the Tribunal's order.
Conclusion: No referable question of law arose, and the request for reference was rejected.