1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court affirms assessment reopening for undisclosed shade tree sale proceeds as assessable capital gains.</h1> The court upheld the reopening of the assessment for the year 1967-68 as the sale proceeds of shade trees were not initially disclosed. The gains from the ... Capital Gains, Original Assessment, Sale Proceeds, Supreme Court Issues involved: Reopening of assessment u/s 147(b) for assessment year 1967-68, assessability of gains from sale of shade trees u/s 45 for various assessment years.Reopening of assessment for 1967-68: The Income Tax Officer (ITO) issued a notice u/s 148 proposing to recompute the income as the sale proceeds of shade trees were not specifically shown in the profit and loss statement. The ITO found that the entire sum realized from the sale of trees was liable for capital gains tax. The assessee contended that the ITO could not reopen the assessment as the amount was admitted in the profit and loss account. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) upheld the capital gains treatment relying on the Supreme Court's decision. The Tribunal agreed with the AAC, citing a Kerala High Court decision, and confirmed the capital gains treatment.Assessability of gains from sale of shade trees: The ITO treated the sale proceeds of shade trees as capital gains for various assessment years, rejecting the assessee's contention that they were agricultural capital receipts. The AAC and Tribunal upheld the capital gains treatment, reducing the percentage of capital gains in later assessment years based on the average girth of trees sold. The Tribunal relied on Supreme Court and High Court decisions to support the capital gains tax treatment.Conclusion: The court held that the ITO had validly reopened the assessment for 1967-68 as the information regarding the sale proceeds of shade trees came to light after the initial assessment. The gains from the sale of shade trees were deemed assessable as capital gains u/s 45 of the Income Tax Act based on relevant judicial precedents. All questions were answered in favor of the revenue, and the assessee was directed to pay costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
