<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (6) TMI 8 - KERALA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25016</link>
    <description>Old and unyielding rubber trees were treated as a capital asset, and the sale proceeds from trees cut and sold by the assessee were regarded as chargeable to capital gains tax. Relying on binding precedent, the matter was considered settled and no debatable legal question was found to arise from the Tribunal&#039;s order. A reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was therefore not warranted, and the request for reference was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:47:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=64014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (6) TMI 8 - KERALA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25016</link>
      <description>Old and unyielding rubber trees were treated as a capital asset, and the sale proceeds from trees cut and sold by the assessee were regarded as chargeable to capital gains tax. Relying on binding precedent, the matter was considered settled and no debatable legal question was found to arise from the Tribunal&#039;s order. A reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was therefore not warranted, and the request for reference was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=25016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>