Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (6) TMI 139 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds appeal, partially allows addition of liabilities as income under IT Act The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, ruling in favor of the assessee. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned. The ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal upholds appeal, partially allows addition of liabilities as income under IT Act

                            The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision, ruling in favor of the assessee. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned. The addition of outstanding liabilities as income under Section 41(1) of the IT Act was partially allowed, with amounts for Skylark Finance Ltd., Mrubee Exports, and Kunjan Enterprises P. Ltd. being deleted. However, the addition for Ajanta Chem & Plast P. Ltd. was upheld due to insufficient evidence. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal in the case.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Delay in filing the appeal by the assessee.
                            2. Addition of outstanding liabilities as income under Section 41(1) of the IT Act.
                            3. Taxability of cessation of liabilities under Section 28(iv) of the IT Act.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Delay in Filing the Appeal by the Assessee:
                            The assessee filed the appeal with a delay of 13 days and provided reasons for the delay. The tribunal condoned the delay, allowing the appeal to proceed.

                            2. Addition of Outstanding Liabilities as Income under Section 41(1) of the IT Act:
                            The Assessing Officer (A.O.) observed that certain amounts were shown as outstanding liabilities under the head 'sundry creditors' in the balance sheet for several years without any transactions. The A.O. treated these amounts as income, arguing that the liabilities had ceased to exist. The amounts involved were:
                            - Skylark Finance Ltd.: Rs. 1,59,25,000/-
                            - Mrubee Exports: Rs. 15,00,000/-
                            - Ajanta Chem & Plast P. Ltd.: Rs. 1,62,324/-
                            - Kunjan Enterprises P. Ltd.: Rs. 3,00,000/-

                            The A.O. relied on the Supreme Court decision in CIT vs. T.V. Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Ltd., where it was held that amounts initially received as capital receipts could be treated as income if they became the assessee's own money over time.

                            3. Taxability of Cessation of Liabilities under Section 28(iv) of the IT Act:
                            The A.O. argued that the cessation of liability resulted in a benefit to the assessee, making it taxable under Section 28(iv) and Section 41(1) of the IT Act. The A.O. added the total amount of Rs. 1,78,87,324/- to the assessee's income.

                            CIT(A) Findings:
                            The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] partly allowed the appeal, deleting the additions for Skylark Finance Ltd., Mrubee Exports, and Kunjan Enterprises P. Ltd. The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's contention that these were business transactions, and the liabilities were still considered outstanding by the assessee. However, the addition for Ajanta Chem & Plast P. Ltd. was upheld as the assessee could not provide satisfactory evidence that the liability still existed.

                            Tribunal's Decision:
                            The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, agreeing that the liabilities for Skylark Finance Ltd., Mrubee Exports, and Kunjan Enterprises P. Ltd. had not ceased and should not be taxed under Section 41(1). The tribunal found that the assessee's intention to pay these amounts was clear, and the case laws cited by the assessee supported this view. The tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal.

                            Conclusion:
                            - The delay in filing the appeal by the assessee was condoned.
                            - The addition of Rs. 1,77,25,000/- for Skylark Finance Ltd., Mrubee Exports, and Kunjan Enterprises P. Ltd. was deleted.
                            - The addition of Rs. 1,62,324/- for Ajanta Chem & Plast P. Ltd. was upheld.
                            - The tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found