Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner, Trade Tax could, after the Tribunal had restored the eligibility certificate, again alter the commencement date of exemption by invoking Section 4-A(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1948.
Analysis: The eligibility certificate granted by the Divisional Level Committee had been restored by the Tribunal after setting aside the Commissioner's earlier order. Once that adjudication attained finality, the Commissioner had no authority to reopen the matter suo motu and vary the consequences of the Tribunal's decision. Any correction, clarification, or modification could have been sought only from the Tribunal or through challenge to that order in revisional jurisdiction. The power under Section 4-A(3) did not extend to overruling or neutralising a concluded adjudication by a higher forum.
Conclusion: The Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to modify the restored eligibility certificate, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: An authority exercising subordinate statutory power cannot alter or defeat the effect of an order that has attained finality before a superior adjudicatory forum.