<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 257 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245786</link>
    <description>Once the Tribunal had restored the assessee&#039;s eligibility certificate and that adjudication had attained finality, the Commissioner could not invoke Section 4-A(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1948 to alter the commencement date of exemption or otherwise neutralise the Tribunal&#039;s order. The power of correction or modification did not extend to reopening a concluded decision of a superior forum, and any challenge or clarification had to be pursued before the Tribunal or in revisional jurisdiction. The restored eligibility certificate therefore remained beyond the Commissioner&#039;s suo motu interference, and the legal position favoured the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=351440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 257 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245786</link>
      <description>Once the Tribunal had restored the assessee&#039;s eligibility certificate and that adjudication had attained finality, the Commissioner could not invoke Section 4-A(3) of the Sales Tax Act, 1948 to alter the commencement date of exemption or otherwise neutralise the Tribunal&#039;s order. The power of correction or modification did not extend to reopening a concluded decision of a superior forum, and any challenge or clarification had to be pursued before the Tribunal or in revisional jurisdiction. The restored eligibility certificate therefore remained beyond the Commissioner&#039;s suo motu interference, and the legal position favoured the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>