Appeal granted: Refund claim upheld, transfer to Consumer Welfare Fund rejected.

The tribunal set aside the order transferring a refund claim to the Consumer Welfare Fund due to unjust enrichment. The appellant, a builder, demonstrated that service tax paid on residential unit sales was not passed on to buyers, supported by evidence like sale deeds and buyer certificates. As unjust enrichment was disproved, the appellant was entitled to the refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling the transfer to the Consumer Welfare Fund was unwarranted.

---

---

Issues: Refund claim transferred to Consumer Welfare Fund due to unjust enrichment

Analysis:

Issue 1: Unjust enrichment in refund claim

The appellant, a builder and developer, filed a refund claim for service tax paid on flats sold to buyers of residential units. The claim was sanctioned but transferred to the Consumer Welfare Fund citing unjust enrichment. The appellant argued that they were not required to pay service tax on these transactions and provided evidence to support their claim, including sale deeds and certificates from buyers confirming no payment of service tax. The lower authorities transferred the refund claim based on the premise of unjust enrichment.

Analysis: The tribunal considered the evidence presented by the appellant, including the absence of service tax invoices issued to buyers and certificates from buyers confirming non-payment of service tax. It was established that the service tax amount was calculated and paid by the appellant, not passed on to the buyers. As a result, the tribunal held that the appellant had successfully demonstrated that unjust enrichment did not occur in this case. Therefore, the appellant was entitled to the refund claim, and the provisions of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act were deemed inapplicable.

Conclusion: The tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with consequential relief to the appellant. The judgment clarified that since the service tax was not liable to be paid by the appellant, the transfer of the refund claim to the Consumer Welfare Fund on the grounds of unjust enrichment was unfounded.

This detailed analysis of the judgment provides a comprehensive overview of the issues involved and the tribunal's decision regarding the refund claim and unjust enrichment in the context of service tax on residential units sold by the appellant.

---