<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 775 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245327</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the order transferring a refund claim to the Consumer Welfare Fund due to unjust enrichment. The appellant, a builder, demonstrated that service tax paid on residential unit sales was not passed on to buyers, supported by evidence like sale deeds and buyer certificates. As unjust enrichment was disproved, the appellant was entitled to the refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling the transfer to the Consumer Welfare Fund was unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=349835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 775 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245327</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the order transferring a refund claim to the Consumer Welfare Fund due to unjust enrichment. The appellant, a builder, demonstrated that service tax paid on residential unit sales was not passed on to buyers, supported by evidence like sale deeds and buyer certificates. As unjust enrichment was disproved, the appellant was entitled to the refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling the transfer to the Consumer Welfare Fund was unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=245327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>