Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the existence of a settlement deed, indemnity bond and no-claim certificate allegedly executed under duress and coercion precluded reference of the disputes to arbitration, or whether that question should be left to the arbitrator as a preliminary issue.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the genuineness and effect of the alleged full and final settlement. The Court applied the principle that a bald plea of fraud, coercion, duress or undue influence is not enough, but where the surrounding material does not permit a conclusive finding at the referral stage, the matter need not be finally decided then and there. On the affidavits and documents, the question whether the settlement documents were voluntarily executed would require examination of witnesses and documentary evidence. The Court therefore found it inappropriate to conclusively hold that the plea of duress was an afterthought or lacked credibility.
Conclusion: The issue of full and final settlement versus execution under duress and coercion was left to be decided first by the arbitral tribunal, and the disputes were referred to a sole arbitrator.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded in securing a reference to arbitration, with the disputed settlement question reserved for determination in the arbitral proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi: At the referral stage, a disputed plea that a discharge or settlement was obtained by fraud, coercion, duress or undue influence need not be finally decided if the materials do not permit a conclusive finding; such issue may be left to arbitration as a preliminary question.