<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (1) TMI 1066 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242850</link>
    <description>The court appointed a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a construction contract, emphasizing the need to address coercion allegations before proceeding with arbitration. The appointment aimed to streamline the process and ensure a fair resolution of the parties&#039; claims, following legal precedents and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court&#039;s decision focused on upholding the integrity of the arbitration process and facilitating a thorough examination of the issues at hand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 06:31:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=343354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (1) TMI 1066 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242850</link>
      <description>The court appointed a sole Arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a construction contract, emphasizing the need to address coercion allegations before proceeding with arbitration. The appointment aimed to streamline the process and ensure a fair resolution of the parties&#039; claims, following legal precedents and the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court&#039;s decision focused on upholding the integrity of the arbitration process and facilitating a thorough examination of the issues at hand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=242850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>