CENVAT credit eligibility on locomotive spares failed to show a clear prima facie case, so partial stay required pre-deposit.

In a waiver and stay application concerning denial of CENVAT credit on a diesel locomotive and its spares, the Tribunal found no clear prima facie case that the goods qualified as capital goods or as an accessory to identified capital goods. The appellant's reliance on the packing plant as a group of machinery, and on Chapter 84 classification, did not establish eligibility for credit, and the lower authority's finding remained unrebutted. As the appellant also did not plead limitation or financial hardship, the Tribunal required a substantial pre-deposit before granting partial stay. Interim relief was therefore allowed only on compliance with the pre-deposit condition, with waiver and stay granted for the balance dues.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of the adjudged dues, including denial of CENVAT credit on a diesel locomotive and its spares, pending appeal.

Analysis: The dispute was confined to merits of eligibility of credit. The locomotive was used within the factory for transporting materials, but the appellant did not satisfactorily show that it qualified as capital goods or as an accessory to identified capital goods. The finding of the lower authority that the packing plant was a group of machineries and that the appellant had not established which machinery the locomotive was an accessory to remained unrebutted. The contention based on Chapter 84 and the claim that packing plant or storage silo could sustain the credit claim did not establish a clear prima facie case. The appellant also did not plead limitation or financial hardship, while the Revenue showed a substantial case on the available material.

Conclusion: The appellant was directed to pre-deposit Rs. 10,00,000 within six weeks, and on compliance, waiver and stay were granted for the balance dues.

Final Conclusion: Interim relief was granted only in part, with a mandatory pre-deposit ordered as a condition for continued stay of the remaining demand.

Ratio Decidendi: In waiver and stay matters, where the applicant fails to establish a clear prima facie entitlement to credit and does not show financial hardship, the Tribunal may require a substantial pre-deposit before granting stay of the balance demand.

---