Modvat credit on capital goods requires proof of nexus with identified machinery; unsupported claims fail.

Modvat credit on components, spares and accessories under Rule 57Q depends on the assessee proving that the goods were eligible capital goods and were used in manufacture of the final product. The decisive requirement is identification of the relevant machinery or equipment so the necessary nexus can be verified. Where the assessee cannot identify the machinery for which the goods were allegedly used, eligibility cannot be established and the credit claim fails. Reliance on earlier mining-related input decisions does not remove this proof requirement. On the facts stated, the denial of Modvat credit was upheld in favour of the Revenue.

---

---

Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to Modvat Credit on the goods claimed as components, spares and accessories under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, despite failing to identify the machinery or equipment for which those goods were used.

Analysis: To claim Modvat or Cenvat credit on capital goods, an assessee must establish that the goods fall within the permitted description and were used in the manufacture of the final product. The assessee was unable to identify the machinery for which the disputed items were allegedly used, and without such identification the authorities could not determine whether the items qualified as eligible capital goods. The fact that the assessee relied on prior decisions concerning mining-related inputs did not assist it, because the decisive requirement remained proof of the nexus between the claimed goods and the identified machinery used in manufacture.

Conclusion: The claim for Modvat Credit was not maintainable and the denial of credit was upheld in favour of the Revenue.

Ratio Decidendi: Eligibility for Modvat Credit on components, spares and accessories depends on the assessee proving, with identification of the relevant machinery, that the goods were used in the manufacture of the final product.

---