ITAT upholds deletion of additions and disallowances, rules transfer of TDRs not subject to capital gains tax

The ITAT dismissed the Department's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision to delete additions and disallowances made by the AO. The ITAT upheld that the transfer of TDRs does not attract capital gains tax due to the lack of a cost of acquisition and that the principle of mutuality protects the receipt from being taxed as dividend income. The order was pronounced on October 12, 2012.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Deletion of addition on account of floor space index related to a flat.
2. Deletion of addition of the amount received from the society on account of transfer of floor space index.
3. Restriction of disallowance by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals).
4. Taxability of the receipt from transfer of transferable development rights under the head "Capital gains".
5. Consideration of the amount received as dividend income from the society.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Deletion of Addition on Account of Floor Space Index Related to a Flat:
The Department contested the deletion of an addition of Rs. 32,12,510 related to the floor space index (FSI) of the flat, which was part of the block of assets on which depreciation had been claimed by the assessee in previous years. The Assessing Officer (AO) had taxed this amount as capital gains under section 50 of the Income-tax Act. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) deleted this addition, relying on various precedents from the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai, which held that transfer of transferable development rights (TDRs) does not attract capital gains tax due to the absence of a cost of acquisition.

2. Deletion of Addition of Amount Received from Society on Account of Transfer of Floor Space Index:
The AO had also added Rs. 33,23,522 received by the assessee from the society as dividend income. The CIT(A) disagreed with this addition, observing that the society was a mutual society formed for the benefit of its members, and thus, the receipt was covered by the principle of mutuality and not taxable in the hands of the individual member. The CIT(A) noted that any tax liability would be on the society, not the individual member.

3. Restriction of Disallowance by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals):
The AO had disallowed Rs. 19,61,052, but the CIT(A) restricted this disallowance to Rs. 2,540. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding no merit in the Department's contention.

4. Taxability of Receipt from Transfer of Transferable Development Rights (TDRs) under "Capital Gains":
The ITAT reviewed the consistent stand taken in various cases that the transfer of TDRs amounts to a transfer of a capital asset. However, since there is no cost of acquisition for such rights, the computation mechanism under section 48 fails, and thus, the receipt from the transfer of TDRs cannot be subjected to capital gains tax. This view was supported by several decisions including Jethalal D. Metha v. Deputy CIT and Maheshwar Prakash-2 Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. ITO. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition.

5. Consideration of the Amount Received as Dividend Income from the Society:
The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A) that the amount received by the assessee from the developer, as per the agreement, was not from the society but directly from the developer for the transfer of respective entitlements. Additionally, the principle of mutuality applied, and thus, the amount could not be taxed as dividend income in the hands of the assessee.

Conclusion:
The ITAT dismissed the Department's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the additions and disallowances made by the AO. The ITAT upheld that the transfer of TDRs does not attract capital gains tax due to the lack of a cost of acquisition and that the principle of mutuality protects the receipt from being taxed as dividend income. The order was pronounced on October 12, 2012.

---