Transfer of Development Rights receipts not taxable in society where individual owners contracted with developer; revenue appeal dismissed.

The article addresses computation of capital gains arising from assignment of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) where a registered society received consideration though it was not the landowner. Because individual flat owners executed separate agreements with the developer for repairs and construction, receipts from TDR assignment were treated as accruing to those owners rather than to the society, resulting in no taxable income in the hands of the society. The assessing officer's attribution of the receipts to the society was set aside and the revenue appeal was dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
The only issue raised in this appeal is against the computation of capital gains.

Comprehensive Details:

Issue: Computation of Capital Gains
The appeal was against the order of CIT(A)-XX, Mumbai, related to the assessment year 2003-04 under section 143(3) read with section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The case involved a registered society consisting of 11 members, entitled to receive Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) from the Municipal Corporation of Mumbai. The TDR was assigned to a builder for repairing the building, and agreements were made between the society and the developer, as well as between individual flat owners and the developer. The Assessing Officer treated the consideration received by flat owners as income of the society. However, the CIT(A) held that no income accrued to the society from the assignment of TDRs and construction of additional floors. The Tribunal noted that the society was not the landowner, and individual flat owners had agreements with the developer for construction and repairs. Following precedent, it was held that the receipts from the assignment of TDRs were not taxable in the hands of the society. The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the appeal by the Revenue.

In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled that the receipts arising from the assignment of TDRs were not taxable in the hands of the assessee society, as the society was not the landowner and individual flat owners had separate agreements with the developer for construction and repairs. The order of the Assessing Officer was found to lack merit, and the decision of the CIT(A) was upheld. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.

---