Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether MODVAT credit was admissible on inputs stored outside the factory premises without prior permission of the jurisdictional Commissioner and in breach of the prescribed circular-based procedure.
Analysis: The storage of modvatable inputs outside the factory was only a relaxation from the ordinary requirement of keeping inputs inside the factory premises. The relaxation under the Board circular operated subject to prior permission of the jurisdictional Commissioner and subject further to taking credit only after the entire consignment covered by the invoice was received inside the factory. The record showed that the appellant applied only to the Deputy Commissioner, no valid permission of the jurisdictional Commissioner was obtained, and credit was taken while the inputs were still lying outside the factory. The absence of a specific allegation about non-use in manufacture did not cure non-compliance with the mandatory procedure where the issue was the availing of credit under a conditional relaxation.
Conclusion: MODVAT credit was rightly denied and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A conditional relaxation permitting storage of inputs outside the factory must be strictly complied with, and credit taken in breach of the prerequisite permission and prescribed receipt procedure is not admissible.