Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to Modvat credit where the inputs were received directly from the manufacturers and the invoices contained the requisite endorsement that duty had been paid, even though the department alleged that the supplier had not actually discharged the duty liability.
Analysis: The Notification governing the credit required only two conditions for availing Modvat credit: direct receipt of inputs from the manufacturer and an invoice containing the necessary endorsement of duty payment. Those conditions were fulfilled. The proviso to rule 57-A(6) requiring reasonable steps was satisfied by compliance with the conditions specified in the Notification. There was no finding that the assessee had participated in any incorrect endorsement, and any failure to pay duty lay with the input manufacturer. In such circumstances, the liability could not be shifted to the assessee.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to the credit, and the departmental appeals were without merit.