Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied on the ground that duty-paid partially oriented yarn was stored for a short period in godowns outside the factory before being brought into the factory for use, and whether penalty was sustainable on that basis.
Analysis: There was no dispute about receipt of the inputs in the factory and their actual use in the manufacture of the final product. The Board's circular and the Commissioner's trade notices recognized storage of inputs outside the factory premises, and the Tribunal treated such storage, when occasioned by business exigencies, as not a valid ground to deny otherwise available credit. On the admitted facts, denial of credit and imposition of penalty were unwarranted.
Conclusion: Modvat credit could not be denied merely because the inputs were temporarily stored outside the factory premises, and the penalty was not sustainable.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals succeeded with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Temporary storage of duty-paid inputs outside the factory premises does not by itself disentitle an assessee from Modvat credit where receipt and use of the inputs in manufacture are undisputed and the practice is recognized by departmental circulars.