Reassessment sanction and commodity classification dispute did not justify writ interference; tax issues left for reassessment.

Writ interference against sanction for reassessment was declined because the taxing authority had proceeded on the then-prevailing understanding of the Supreme Court ruling and had not yet examined the impact of later binding precedent. The dispute over whether wire rods and wires are the same commodity, and whether the earlier view on exemption for inter-State sales of steel wire still held good, was treated as a for the reassessment authority to consider first. As no clear ground for writ relief was shown, the writ petitions were dismissed and the reassessment proceedings were allowed to continue.

---

---

Issues: Whether the sanction for reopening the assessments and the challenge to the exemption on inter-State sales of steel wire warranted interference in writ jurisdiction.

Analysis: The assessment orders showed that the taxing authority had proceeded on the basis of the then prevailing understanding of the Supreme Court decision relied upon by the assessee and had not examined the effect of later binding precedent. The Court noted that the controversy whether wire rods and wires are the same commodity, and whether the earlier view continued to hold good, raised questions that were appropriately for the reassessment authority to consider in the first instance. Since the impugned sanction order only permitted initiation of reassessment proceedings and no clear case for writ interference was made out, the petitioners were not entitled to relief.

Conclusion: Interference was declined and the writ petitions were dismissed.

Final Conclusion: The challenge to the reassessment sanction failed, leaving the authorities free to decide the disputed taxability issues in the reassessment proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessment has not examined the issue in light of binding later precedent and the dispute is fit for examination in reassessment proceedings, writ interference against sanction for reopening is not warranted.

---