Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether iron wires manufactured from wire rods could be treated as a separate taxable commodity for sales tax purposes, notwithstanding that wire rods and wires are grouped together in the declared goods entry.
Analysis: The statutory scheme for declared goods under Section 14 of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, read with the restriction on multiple taxation in Section 15 of that Act, was treated as controlling. The grouping of wire rods and wires in the same sub-item was taken to mean that the legislature did not intend wires to be subjected to a second levy where the wire rods had already suffered tax. The Court distinguished the rival line of decisions on commercially different commodities and held that the special treatment of declared goods prevented repeated taxation on the same goods in this setting.
Conclusion: Iron wires were not liable to be taxed again if the wire rods used for their manufacture had already suffered sales tax; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.