Theater Owners' Ban on DTH Film Releases Triggers Antitrust Probe in Tamil Nadu.

The Competition Commission of India determined that the resolution by the association of theatre owners in Tamil Nadu, which aimed to prevent the screening of films released on Direct to Home Satellite Television Services before theatrical release, constituted a prima facie anti-competitive agreement under Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002. Consequently, the Commission ordered the Director General to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the matter within 60 days to assess the potential contravention of competition laws, emphasizing that this directive did not represent a final judgment on the case's merits.

---

---

Issues:
Violation of competition law by an association of theatre owners in Tamil Nadu by passing a resolution not to cooperate in screening films released on Direct to Home Satellite Television Services (DTH) platform before theatrical release.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Alleged Anti-competitive Agreement
The informant, a partnership firm, produced a film for global release in three languages. It planned to premiere the movie on DTH platforms before theatrical release. However, the association of theatre owners in Tamil Nadu passed a resolution not to cooperate in screening films released on DTH or any other technology before theatrical release. The informant contended that this resolution contravened the provisions of section 3(1) read with section 3(3)(b) of the Competition Act, 2002.

Issue 2: Competition Law and Consumer Welfare
The Competition Commission of India emphasized the objective of competition law to promote competition and consumer welfare. It noted that technological innovations and novel uses of technology enhance competition and consumer welfare. The Commission recognized the informant's attempt to experiment with an innovative way to premiere its movie through DTH for wider consumer reach. The decision of the association of theatre owners to restrict screening of movies released on DTH or any other technology appeared to limit the market of film exhibition, potentially affecting competition and consumer benefit from newer technologies.

Issue 3: Prima Facie Case of Anti-Competitive Behavior
The Commission found that the resolution of the association of theatre owners seemed to be an agreement among its members to control the market of film exhibition and innovative technical developments in the industry. The resolution was deemed to be anti-competitive as it restricted producers from providing consumers with economic opportunities to watch premieres at home. The Commission concluded that the resolution prima facie contravened Section 3 of the Act and warranted further investigation by the Director General (DG).

Conclusion:
In light of the above analysis, the Competition Commission of India directed the DG to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter and submit a report within 60 days. The Commission clarified that its order did not signify a final opinion on the case's merits, and the DG should carry out the investigation impartially without being influenced by the Commission's observations. The Secretary was instructed to provide relevant materials to the DG and concerned parties in accordance with the Act and regulations.

---