<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 168 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233583</link>
    <description>The Competition Commission of India determined that the resolution by the association of theatre owners in Tamil Nadu, which aimed to prevent the screening of films released on Direct to Home Satellite Television Services before theatrical release, constituted a prima facie anti-competitive agreement under Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002. Consequently, the Commission ordered the Director General to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the matter within 60 days to assess the potential contravention of competition laws, emphasizing that this directive did not represent a final judgment on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2024 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=195998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 168 - COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233583</link>
      <description>The Competition Commission of India determined that the resolution by the association of theatre owners in Tamil Nadu, which aimed to prevent the screening of films released on Direct to Home Satellite Television Services before theatrical release, constituted a prima facie anti-competitive agreement under Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002. Consequently, the Commission ordered the Director General to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the matter within 60 days to assess the potential contravention of competition laws, emphasizing that this directive did not represent a final judgment on the case&#039;s merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Law of Competition</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>