Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether joint owners or co-sharers in shamilat deh could claim occupancy rights under Sections 5 and 8 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, notwithstanding the bar under Section 10 and the scheme of the Punjab Occupancy Tenants (Vesting of Proprietary Rights) Act, 1952 and the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961.
Analysis: The right of occupancy under the Tenancy Act is available to a tenant, and the expression "any person" in Section 8 cannot be read in isolation to override the statutory scheme. Section 10 specifically bars a joint owner from acquiring occupancy rights in jointly owned land in the absence of a contrary custom. The material on record showed that the appellants and their predecessors were recorded as joint owners or co-sharers in shamilat deh and not as tenants, and no tenancy was created by agreement. The provisions of the 1952 Act also did not assist them because the benefit of proprietary vesting is confined to an occupancy tenant as defined by that Act. The claim under Section 4(3)(ii) of the 1961 Act likewise did not displace the bar created by Section 10 where the claimants were joint owners.
Conclusion: Joint owners or co-sharers in shamilat deh cannot claim occupancy rights under Sections 5 and 8 of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887 when Section 10 applies and no tenancy is established; the claim fails.
Ratio Decidendi: A statutory provision conferring occupancy rights on a tenant cannot be used by a recorded joint owner or co-sharer to defeat an express legislative bar against joint owners acquiring occupancy rights in jointly owned land.