Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the limitation bar in Section 26(2) of the C. P. and Berar Sales Tax Act (C. P. XXI of 1947) applied to a prosecution for filing false returns and producing incorrect accounts under the Act.
Analysis: Section 26(2) used the words "any person" without restriction and was not confined to Government servants. The making of returns was done under Section 10 of the Act and the production of accounts was done under Section 15 of the Act. Since the impugned acts arose from compliance with those statutory provisions, they were acts done under the Act. The view that a false return or incorrect accounts fell outside the Act because they exposed the dealer to penal liability was rejected.
Conclusion: The prosecution was governed by Section 26(2) and was barred by limitation. The issue was decided in favour of the assessee.