Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the disallowance of expenditure on account of power purchase price payable was sustainable; (ii) whether credit of advance tax and self-assessment tax required verification and allowance; (iii) whether interest under sections 234B and 234C was chargeable.
Issue (i): Whether the disallowance of expenditure on account of power purchase price payable was sustainable.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed its later orders in the assessee's own case and held that the subsequent view had considered the relevant facts, including the recommendation of the Nair Committee, which had not been fully taken into account in the earlier year. The earlier decision for the prior assessment year was therefore not followed.
Conclusion: The disallowance was upheld and the issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether credit of advance tax and self-assessment tax required verification and allowance.
Analysis: The Tribunal accepted that the entitlement to credit depended upon verification of the tax deposits and the tax payable, and that the Assessing Officer should examine the vouchers and grant the permissible credit.
Conclusion: The issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for verification and appropriate credit, in favour of the assessee to that extent.
Issue (iii): Whether interest under sections 234B and 234C was chargeable.
Analysis: Relying on the Supreme Court's ruling on the meaning of assessed tax and the applicability of the same principle to section 234C, the Tribunal held that interest under both provisions was leviable.
Conclusion: The levy of interest under sections 234B and 234C was sustained and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in part, with one issue sent back for verification while the remaining substantive additions and interest were upheld.