Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible in respect of Special Additional Duty of Customs debited under the DEPB and Target Plus schemes, and whether any substantial question of law arose in the Revenue's appeal.
Analysis: The authorities below allowed the assessee's claim by following the binding circular clarifying that duty debited through schemes such as DEPB and Target Plus would qualify for Cenvat benefit or drawback, including full credit of the 4% Special CVD. The appellate tribunal also relied on its earlier decision taking the same view, and the High Court found no error in that approach. On the facts and the settled position reflected in the circular and precedent, the matter did not raise any substantial question of law.
Conclusion: The Cenvat credit was held admissible, and the Revenue's appeal failed.