Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on Special Additional Duty paid through the Target Plus scheme under the applicable customs notification.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the additional duty debited under the Target Plus scheme could be treated as duty eligible for Cenvat credit. The Court noted that the present issue was scheme-specific and distinguished earlier decisions relating to DEPB and similar schemes. It relied on the jurisdictional High Court's ruling in respect of the Target Plus scheme, and also on the terms of the notification which permitted drawback or CENVAT credit of additional duty leviable under section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act. On that basis, the Court accepted that Special Additional Duty paid by debit under the Target Plus scheme fell within the credit mechanism contemplated by the notification.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit was admissible on the Special Additional Duty paid through the Target Plus scheme; the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order allowing credit was sustained and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the jurisdictional High Court has upheld eligibility of credit for Special Additional Duty debited under a specific export incentive scheme, and the governing notification permits credit of additional duty under section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, such credit cannot be denied.