Interest converted to equity not deductible under section 43B.

The ITAT Kolkata upheld the Assessing Officer's decision to disallow the deduction claimed for interest payment converted into equity shares. The ITAT emphasized that the conversion of interest payable into equity shares does not constitute actual payment under section 43B of the Income Tax Act, distinguishing between discharging debt by transferring securities and issuing own capital. The decision aligned with the precedent set by a coordinate bench, emphasizing the necessity of actual payment for deductions, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue in the appeal.

---

---

Issues Involved:
Appeal challenging correctness of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)'s order regarding assessment u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2005-06, focusing on the deletion of addition u/s. 43B of the I.T. Act and the treatment of conversion of interest payable in equity shares as actual payment u/s. 43B.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Deletion of Addition u/s. 43B
The Assessing Officer raised concerns about the deduction claimed for interest paid to IDBI without actual payment, as the interest dues were converted into equity shares. CIT(Appeals) allowed the deduction, citing section 43B and the retrospective effect of Explanation 3D introduced by the Finance Act, 2006. The CIT(Appeals) reasoned that conversion of interest payable into equity shares signifies actual payment, as it represents a part of the ownership of the company given to the lender. This decision was based on the premise that the conversion into shares reduces the interest receivable from the assessee, thus qualifying for deduction u/s. 43B. The issue revolved around whether such conversion could be considered as actual payment of interest.

Issue 2: Treatment of Conversion of Interest Payable in Equity Shares
The Assessing Officer contended that conversion of interest payable into equity is not a valid mode of payment, referencing judicial precedents and the distinction between discharging debt by transferring securities and issuing own capital. The Assessing Officer relied on a coordinate bench decision in the case of SRF Ltd., which held that issuance of shares does not constitute expenditure and cannot be considered as payment towards expenditure. The Assessing Officer argued that there is a fundamental difference between discharging a debt by giving away an asset and issuing capital, with the latter not amounting to payment. Despite the appellant's reliance on CBDT Circular No. 7, emphasizing various ways of discharging liabilities, the Assessing Officer maintained that unless actual payment is made, the restriction under section 43B stands, disallowing the deduction.

Judgment
The ITAT Kolkata upheld the Assessing Officer's grievance and restored the disallowance of the claimed deduction for interest payment converted into equity shares. The decision was based on the precedent set by the coordinate bench in the SRF Ltd. case, which highlighted that issuance of shares does not involve expenditure and cannot be equated with payment towards expenditure. The ITAT Kolkata concurred with the view that there is a significant difference between discharging a debt by transferring securities and issuing capital, with the former constituting payment. Despite the appellant's arguments and reliance on CBDT Circular No. 7, the ITAT Kolkata emphasized the requirement of actual payment for deduction under section 43B, ultimately ruling in favor of the Assessing Officer and allowing the appeal filed by the Revenue.

---