TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether excise duty credited in the Personal Ledger Account was deductible under section 43B on payment basis. (ii) Whether prior period expenses were allowable where the liability crystallised during the relevant year. (iii) Whether interest liability of the amalgamating company discharged by issue of shares was allowable under section 43B. (iv) Whether unabsorbed investment allowance of the amalgamating company could be carried forward and set off by the amalgamated company.
Issue (i): Whether excise duty credited in the Personal Ledger Account was deductible under section 43B on payment basis.
Analysis: The amount was deposited through the Personal Ledger Account under the excise regime and was not withdrawable without prior permission. The governing provision allowed deduction on actual payment for liabilities covered by section 43B, and the payment through the excise account was treated as discharge of the duty liability even though the liability had not yet formally accrued in the conventional sense.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and the deduction was allowable.
Issue (ii): Whether prior period expenses were allowable where the liability crystallised during the relevant year.
Analysis: The expenses related to business expenditure of a day-to-day nature, and the liability became known and quantifiable only when the claims and bills were received and approved during the year. Once the liability crystallised in the relevant previous year, deduction could not be denied merely because the underlying expenditure related to an earlier period. The matter relating to expenditure debited in a subsequent year also required examination as to the year of crystallisation.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee to the extent the liability crystallised during the year, and the related matter was remitted for examination in respect of the subsequent-year debit.
Issue (iii): Whether interest liability of the amalgamating company discharged by issue of shares was allowable under section 43B.
Analysis: The liability belonged to the amalgamating company and was settled by issuance of equity shares by the amalgamated company. Section 43B requires actual payment, and issuance of shares does not amount to payment out of the coffers of the assessee or to spending in the relevant sense. A discharge by shares was therefore not equivalent to actual payment of interest liability for deduction purposes.
Conclusion: The issue was decided against the assessee and the deduction was not allowable.
Issue (iv): Whether unabsorbed investment allowance of the amalgamating company could be carried forward and set off by the amalgamated company.
Analysis: The statutory scheme for amalgamation did not confine relief only to unabsorbed depreciation and business loss when the specific provision governing investment allowance applied. Section 32A(6) specifically enabled carry forward and set off of unabsorbed investment allowance subject to the statutory conditions, and the lower authority had wrongly applied the amalgamation provision in isolation.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee and the benefit was directed to be allowed subject to compliance with the statutory conditions.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded on the excise duty claim, prior-period crystallised expenses and unabsorbed investment allowance, but failed on the interest liability discharged by issue of shares, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Deduction under section 43B is available only on actual payment of the relevant liability, whereas liabilities that crystallise during the year are deductible in that year even if they relate to earlier periods, and a specific provision governing investment allowance overrides a general amalgamation provision for carry forward and set off.
TaxTMI 
