No depreciation for amalgamation-recorded goodwill when no excess payment over fair market value proven (Section 32)

ITAT, Mumbai held that where no demonstrable excess payment over the fair market value of net assets is shown, amounts recorded as goodwill on amalgamation cannot be treated as commercial goodwill eligible for depreciation. The tribunal found the alleged goodwill to be a mere book entry reflecting intrinsic value of fixed assets rather than a separate purchase of intangible commercial rights, and accordingly disallowed depreciation claimed by the assessee. Decision entered against the assessee.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Allowability of depreciation on goodwill.
2. Credit for TDS.
3. Validity of transfer pricing adjustment.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Allowability of Depreciation on Goodwill:
The primary issue was whether the assessee could claim depreciation on goodwill. The assessee company had amalgamated with Casablancas Gannon Engineering Ltd. (CGEL), and the difference between the value of assets and liabilities taken over from CGEL and the book value of investments by the assessee in CGEL was shown as goodwill. The Revenue argued that goodwill is not an intangible asset eligible for depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had not valued each asset and liability of CGEL at fair market value, which is essential under the "Purchase" method as per AS/14. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee did not purchase goodwill in the nature of commercial rights and that the claimed depreciation was merely a book entry. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

2. Credit for TDS:
The second issue was whether the assessee was entitled to credit for TDS in the year of receipt, irrespective of the year in which the corresponding income was offered for taxation. The Tribunal referred to its earlier decision in the assessee's own case (100 TTJ 373) and ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the TDS credit in the year of receipt. Thus, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on this ground.

3. Validity of Transfer Pricing Adjustment:
The third issue concerned the validity of the transfer pricing adjustment and the deletion of the addition made on account of club expenses. The Tribunal observed that the Commissioner (Appeals) had relied on the remand report submitted by the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) and had accepted the findings that the transactions in question were not with Associated Enterprises (AEs) but with third parties. The Tribunal found the grounds raised by the Revenue to be misconceived, as the Assessing Officer could not appeal against his own findings. Therefore, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal on these grounds.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal, granting relief on the issue of depreciation on goodwill while dismissing the appeals related to TDS credit and transfer pricing adjustment. The order was pronounced in the open Court on 25th May 2012.

---