Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2011 (1) TMI 1226 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Depreciation on Alleged Amalgamation Goodwill Disallowed; Rs11.51 Crore Treated as Fictitious, Alternative Capital Loss Claim Denied ITAT PANAJI - AT upheld the CIT(A)'s rejection of the taxpayer's depreciation claim on alleged goodwill arising from an amalgamation, finding no genuine ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Depreciation on Alleged Amalgamation Goodwill Disallowed; Rs11.51 Crore Treated as Fictitious, Alternative Capital Loss Claim Denied

                          ITAT PANAJI - AT upheld the CIT(A)'s rejection of the taxpayer's depreciation claim on alleged goodwill arising from an amalgamation, finding no genuine intangible asset or actual cost and characterizing the goodwill as fictitious; depreciation of Rs.11,51,47,507 was disallowed. The tribunal also dismissed the alternative claim for a capital loss deduction, ruling the acquisition loss non-deductible. On this basis the appeal was found devoid of merit and dismissed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of depreciation on intangible assets described as 'goodwill'.
                          2. Evaluation of the nature and treatment of goodwill in amalgamation.
                          3. Claim for the entire amount as revenue expenditure if depreciation is disallowed.
                          4. Examination of the accounting treatment and its compliance with standard practices.
                          5. Consideration of alternative plea for deduction of capital loss.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Depreciation on Intangible Assets Described as 'Goodwill':
                          The primary issue concerns the disallowance of depreciation claimed by the assessee on goodwill arising from the amalgamation of Mandovi Pellets Ltd. (MPL) with Chowgule and Co. Ltd. The assessee claimed depreciation of Rs. 11,51,47,507, which was 25% of Rs. 46,05,90,029, the value of the goodwill. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, stating that the goodwill was self-generated and not acquired on amalgamation, as per section 32(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, which does not recognize goodwill as a depreciable asset.

                          2. Evaluation of the Nature and Treatment of Goodwill in Amalgamation:
                          The Assessing Officer found that the goodwill was a balancing figure post-amalgamation and not an acquired asset. The scheme of amalgamation approved by the High Court stated that any shortfall in net assets would be debited to the goodwill account. The assessee argued that the goodwill represented intangible assets like know-how and brand value, which should be depreciable. However, the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) held that the goodwill was self-generated and not an actual cost incurred by the assessee, thus not eligible for depreciation.

                          3. Claim for the Entire Amount as Revenue Expenditure if Depreciation is Disallowed:
                          The assessee alternatively claimed that if depreciation on goodwill was disallowed, the entire amount should be treated as revenue expenditure. This claim was also rejected by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), who found that the expenditure was capital in nature and not eligible for deduction as revenue expenditure.

                          4. Examination of the Accounting Treatment and Its Compliance with Standard Practices:
                          The assessee followed the 'purchase method' of accounting as per Accounting Standard 14 (AS-14) prescribed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India. The Assessing Officer noted that AS-14 mandates the treatment of goodwill as an asset but does not explicitly allow for its depreciation. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) supported this view, emphasizing that accounting standards cannot override specific provisions of the Income-tax Act regarding depreciation.

                          5. Consideration of Alternative Plea for Deduction of Capital Loss:
                          The assessee's alternative plea for allowing deduction of the goodwill amount as a capital loss was also rejected. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) found that the loss incurred was capital in nature and not deductible. The assessee's claim was considered inconsistent and lacking credible evidence of actual cost incurred for acquiring goodwill.

                          Conclusion:
                          The appeal was dismissed, with the ITAT upholding the disallowance of depreciation on goodwill and rejecting the alternative claims. The judgment emphasized the distinction between accounting practices and statutory provisions of the Income-tax Act, reaffirming that self-generated goodwill arising from amalgamation does not qualify for depreciation or revenue expenditure deductions.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found