Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2012 (5) TMI 138 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeal partially allowed by Tribunal for TDS credit of Rs. 8,77,881. Dismissed interest claim under section 244A. The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, directing the credit for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) amounting to Rs. 8,77,881 to be allowed to the assessee for ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Appeal partially allowed by Tribunal for TDS credit of Rs. 8,77,881. Dismissed interest claim under section 244A.

                            The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, directing the credit for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) amounting to Rs. 8,77,881 to be allowed to the assessee for the relevant assessment year. The Tribunal dismissed the second ground concerning interest under section 244A as it was not pressed by the Authorized Representative.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Disallowance of credit of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) amounting to Rs. 8,77,881.
                            2. Direction for not allowing interest under section 244A.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Disallowance of Credit of TDS:

                            Facts of the Case:
                            The assessee filed a return declaring a total loss of Rs. 7.72 crore. Based on AIR information, it was revealed that the assessee received rent of Rs. 39 lakh. The Assessing Officer (AO) noted that the assessee claimed credit for TDS amounting to Rs. 8,77,881 without offering the rental income for taxation. The assessee explained that the rent agreement was between the landlord and M/s. Arvind Brands Limited, and the franchisee paid rent to the assessee after deducting TDS. The AO agreed that the assessee did not receive any rental income and did not make any addition on this account. However, the AO held that the TDS amount could not be refunded as the assessee had not shown any rental income. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] echoed this decision, invoking section 199.

                            Tribunal's Observations:
                            The Tribunal noted that the assessee acted as a middleman, receiving rent from Guys & Gals and passing it to M/s. Arvind Brands Limited for onward transmission to the landlords. The assessee did not earn any rental income, and the AO accepted this by not taxing the rent in the assessee's hands. The Tribunal observed that the rent suffered TDS twice: once when Guys & Gals paid the assessee and again when M/s. Arvind Brands Limited paid the landlords.

                            Legal Provisions and Interpretation:
                            - Section 190 mandates that tax on income is payable by deduction at source.
                            - Section 194-I requires deduction of tax at source from rental income.
                            - Section 199 provides that TDS is treated as a payment of tax on behalf of the person from whose income the deduction was made and credit is given for the assessment year for which such income is assessable.

                            The Tribunal emphasized that TDS should be deducted only when the amount is in the nature of income. Since the assessee acted as a conduit, the rent was not income in its hands. The Tribunal highlighted that the credit for TDS should be allowed to the payee of the income and not to an intermediary. The Tribunal also referred to Article 265 of the Constitution of India, which states that no tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal concluded that the credit for TDS must be allowed to the assessee in the year the income was received, even if the income was not chargeable to tax in its hands. The Tribunal directed that the credit for TDS amounting to Rs. 8,77,881 be allowed to the assessee for the relevant assessment year.

                            2. Direction for Not Allowing Interest under Section 244A:

                            Facts and Tribunal's Observations:
                            The second ground concerned the direction of the CIT(A) for not allowing interest under section 244A even if the credit for TDS was allowed by higher forums. The learned Authorized Representative (AR) did not press this ground.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal dismissed this ground as not pressed.

                            Final Judgment:
                            The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal directing that the credit for TDS amounting to Rs. 8,77,881 be allowed to the assessee for the assessment year under consideration. The second ground regarding interest under section 244A was dismissed as not pressed.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found