TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessee entitled to TDS credit refund on advance from HPCL despite no corresponding income offered</h1> <h3>LEC-TPL UJV Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 41 (1) (2), Mumbai</h3> ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee's appeal regarding TDS credit claim. Despite the DR's contention that no corresponding income was offered to tax, the ... Grant of short credit of TDS - as per DR no income has been offered to tax corresponding to the amount of TDS being claimed by the assessee, the credit for TDS cannot be given to the assessee in the year under consideration - HELD THAT:- Considering circulars of the CBDT relating to granting of refund of TDS, we are of the view that the assessee is entitled to claim refund on TDS deducted from the advance given to it by HPCL. AO may however, verify from the system that no refund of the TDS in question has been claimed by the HPCL by way of filing of a revised TDS return. Subject to the above, the AO is directed to allow credit of brought-forward TDS as claimed by the assessee. Appeal of the assessee is allowed. Issues: Grant of short credit of TDSAnalysis:The appeal was filed against the order of the Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income-tax for the assessment year 2021-22. The primary issue raised in the appeal was regarding the grant of short credit of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) to the assessee. The appellant contended that the credit of TDS granted was lower than the amount claimed in the return of income and reflected in Form 26AS, resulting in a shortfall of Rs. 22,63,023. The appellant sought direction for the full credit of TDS as claimed.Facts and Background:The assessee, a joint venture engaged in construction contracts, declared income of Rs. 54,89,480 during the relevant year and claimed TDS credit amounting to Rs. 29,98,646. However, the Central Processing Centre (CPC) granted credit of only Rs. 10,35,704. The dispute arose from the TDS related to advance money received from Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) for a bio-ethanol plant project in Punjab. TDS of Rs. 97,25,900 was deducted by HPCL, out of which a portion was claimed in the previous assessment year, leaving a balance to be claimed in the current year.Arguments and Observations:The Additional Commissioner dismissed the appeal, citing Rule 37BA and the need for a revised TDS return from the deducting party. However, the Tribunal disagreed and allowed the appeal. The Tribunal noted that since the contract was terminated, and the money refunded, the assessee was entitled to claim the balance TDS credit. The appellant's reliance on CBDT circulars and judicial precedents supported the claim for TDS refund. Notably, the Tribunal referenced circulars related to rental income and procedures for claiming refunds under Section 195. Judicial decisions were also cited to emphasize the right to credit for TDS on non-taxable amounts.Conclusion:After considering the arguments, circulars, and judicial pronouncements, the Tribunal held in favor of the assessee. It directed the Assessing Officer to verify if HPCL had claimed a refund of the TDS and allowed the credit of brought-forward TDS as claimed by the assessee. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the entitlement of the assessee to claim a refund on TDS deducted by HPCL.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
