Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to avail Cenvat credit on Wear Plate, HRSS Plate, MS Plate, Angles, Channels and similar items used in connection with machinery for manufacture of clinker, and whether such items could be treated as capital goods.
Analysis: The credit dispute turned on whether the impugned structural items had a sufficient nexus with the manufacturing machinery. The prior Supreme Court rulings relied upon held that steel plates, channels and similar items used for fabrication or installation of machinery components, where they enable the machinery to function effectively in production, are not to be excluded merely because they are structural in nature. Applying that principle, the items used for connecting, fitting, ducting, casing and related machinery support in the kiln system were treated as falling within the ambit of capital goods for credit purposes.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to Cenvat credit on the impugned items as capital goods.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the Tribunal's order allowing credit was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used in the fabrication, fitting or support of machinery, where they have a direct functional nexus with manufacture, may qualify as capital goods for credit entitlement even if they are structural items.