Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether cenvat credit was admissible on structural steel items such as angles, channels, beams and plates used in the fabrication of support structures for plant and machinery treated as capital goods.
Analysis: The relevant question was not whether the plant or machinery was immovable, but whether the steel items, on the facts of use, were employed in relation to capital goods and formed part of their fabrication or support arrangement within the manufacturing setup. Applying the user test, structural items used to make machinery effectively operational and to support integrated plant and equipment were treated as having a functional nexus with capital goods. The reasoning was supported by prior decisions holding that such structurals used for erection or fabrication of plant and machinery are eligible for credit.
Conclusion: Cenvat credit on the structural steel items was admissible and the disallowance was unsustainable.