CENVAT credit on fabrication materials and factory equipment upheld where goods satisfied the user test as capital goods or inputs.

CENVAT credit was examined for steel plates, channels, angles, structural items, fire-fighting equipment, lighting fittings, air-conditioner parts and cutting tools under the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. Goods used in fabrication of storage tanks, support structures and machinery were treated as eligible where the user test was satisfied, because they fell within capital goods or their components, spares and accessories. Reliance on Vandana Global Ltd. was rejected as that decision had been overruled, and Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. was applied to recognise steel and similar items used in integral plant components as creditable. Fire extinguishers, parts and related fittings were also treated as eligible inputs or capital goods for factory use.

---

---

Issues: Whether CENVAT credit was admissible on steel plates, channels, angles, structural items, fire-fighting equipment and parts, lighting fittings, air-conditioner parts, cutting tools and allied goods claimed as capital goods or inputs under the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944.

Analysis: The disputed goods were examined in the context of Rule 57Q and Rule 57AA of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The items used in fabrication of storage tanks, support structures and machinery were held to satisfy the user test and to fall within the ambit of capital goods or their components, spares and accessories. The earlier reliance on Vandana Global Ltd. was held to be untenable since that decision had been overruled. The ruling in Rajasthan Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. was applied to hold that steel plates, channels and similar items used in fabrication of integral plant components are eligible. Fire extinguishers, their parts, lighting fittings and related consumables were also treated as eligible, being covered by the definition of capital goods or inputs as applicable to the factory use.

Conclusion: The denial of credit on the disputed items was unsustainable, and the credit was held admissible in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The disallowance of CENVAT credit on the disputed items was set aside and the appeals succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Goods used in fabrication of integral plant components or support structures, and goods falling within the functional scope of capital goods or their components, spares and accessories, are eligible for credit where the user test is satisfied under the relevant credit rules.

---