TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeals Dismissed: Automatic Regularization Not Granted Without Confirmation Order. Parties Bear Own Costs.</h1> <h3>Mohd. Salman Versus Committee of Management and Ors.</h3> The court dismissed the appeals, ruling that automatic regularization post-probation was not applicable without a specific order confirming satisfactory ... - Issues involved: Interpretation of Rule 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Ashaskiya Arabi Tatha Farsi Madarson Ki Manyata Niyamawali for deemed confirmation of service as an Assistant Teacher.Facts: The Appellant was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on probation, with extensions granted based on performance evaluations. Despite opportunities to improve, the Appellant's service was terminated by the Respondent.Contentions: Appellant argued for deemed confirmation post-probation based on previous court decisions. Respondents cited correspondences and legal precedents to support probation continuation until confirmation order.Analysis: Rule 26 specified probation terms and conditions, allowing for termination before completion. Court found the decision in Akbar Ali Khan case more relevant, emphasizing the need for a specific confirmation order post-probation.Conclusion: The court dismissed the appeals, stating that without a specific order confirming satisfactory service, automatic regularization post-probation was not applicable. Each party was directed to bear their own costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
