https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197380 Under Rule 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Ashaskiya Arabi Tatha Farsi Madarson Ki Manyata Niyamawali, probation did not automatically mature into regular service on expiry of the probation period. The rule allowed an initial one-year probation, extendable by one year, and permitted removal before completion of probation; it did not create a maximum probation regime leading to deemed confirmation. Applying the principles in Akbar Ali Khan and Kedar Nath Bahl, the Court noted that continuation in service after probation, without an express order of confirmation, does not by itself confer substantive appointment. Adverse correspondence on unsatisfactory performance also supported the non-confirmation of the teacher. en-us Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jan 2018 10:05:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197380 Under Rule 26 of the Uttar Pradesh Ashaskiya Arabi Tatha Farsi Madarson Ki Manyata Niyamawali, probation did not automatically mature into regular service on expiry of the probation period. The rule allowed an initial one-year probation, extendable by one year, and permitted removal before completion of probation; it did not create a maximum probation regime leading to deemed confirmation. Applying the principles in Akbar Ali Khan and Kedar Nath Bahl, the Court noted that continuation in service after probation, without an express order of confirmation, does not by itself confer substantive appointment. Adverse correspondence on unsatisfactory performance also supported the non-confirmation of the teacher. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197380