Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a criminal revision pending before the High Court abates on the death of the petitioner, and whether the High Court can, in such a revision, examine the conviction itself when a sentence of fine survives against the deceased petitioner's estate.
Analysis: Section 431 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in terms governs appeals and not criminal revisions. The revisional power under section 439, read with section 435, is a discretionary supervisory jurisdiction exercised in aid of justice and does not confer a vested right of appeal or continuation on a litigant. In the absence of any express statutory provision applying abatement rules to criminal revisions, the High Court is not bound to treat a pending revision as abated merely because the petitioner has died. Where the revision concerns a sentence of fine, the question affects the deceased's estate, and the propriety of the fine cannot be effectively examined without going into the correctness of the conviction that supports it.
Conclusion: A criminal revision does not automatically abate on the death of the petitioner, and the High Court may examine the conviction as well as the sentence of fine where it chooses to entertain the revision.
Ratio Decidendi: In the absence of an express statutory bar, the High Court's revisional jurisdiction survives the death of the petitioner and may extend to the conviction itself where determination of a surviving fine requires it.