<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1958 (10) TMI 49 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194187</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, remitting the case to the High Court to be dealt with in accordance with law. The judgment clarified that the High Court has the discretion to continue with a revision application after the death of the petitioner, especially when the sentence includes a fine. The High Court is empowered to examine the merits of the conviction and sentence to ensure justice is served.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:27:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=487593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1958 (10) TMI 49 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194187</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, remitting the case to the High Court to be dealt with in accordance with law. The judgment clarified that the High Court has the discretion to continue with a revision application after the death of the petitioner, especially when the sentence includes a fine. The High Court is empowered to examine the merits of the conviction and sentence to ensure justice is served.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 1958 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=194187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>