TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court sets aside previous orders, directs trial court to consider objections under Section 30.</h1> <h3>Union of India Versus Hanuman Prasad and Brothers</h3> Union of India Versus Hanuman Prasad and Brothers - 2000 AIR (SCW) 3934, 2000 (8) JT 330, 2001 (8) SCC 476 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned orders of the High Court and trial court, directed the trial court to consider objections under Section 30 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and directed the appellant to pay Rs. 5,000 as special cost to the respondent. The court also instructed the investment of Rs. 24,37,868 deposited in the court in a Nationalised Bank for a specified period. The earlier order regarding keeping a net balance of Rs. 7 lacs in a bank account was deemed no longer valid.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
