https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192854 A short delay in filing objections under Section 30 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 may be condoned where sufficient cause is shown, so the objections should be decided on merits rather than rejected on limitation. Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to proceedings for making the award a rule of the court unless expressly excluded, and the contrary view was erroneous. The impugned orders were set aside, the objections were restored for determination by the trial court, and consequential directions on costs and interim deposit followed. en-us Mon, 06 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jun 2017 18:31:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192854 A short delay in filing objections under Section 30 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 may be condoned where sufficient cause is shown, so the objections should be decided on merits rather than rejected on limitation. Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies to proceedings for making the award a rule of the court unless expressly excluded, and the contrary view was erroneous. The impugned orders were set aside, the objections were restored for determination by the trial court, and consequential directions on costs and interim deposit followed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192854