Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether coal, natural gas, coke and furnace oil used in the manufacture of sponge iron and allied products were raw material inputs so as to entitle the dealer to full input tax credit without reduction under section 11(3)(b)(iii) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003.
Analysis: The disputed inputs were examined in the context of the manufacturing process and the earlier binding view of the Court on the same statutory provision. The Court accepted that where the material participates in the manufacturing activity as an ingredient of the end product, the mere fact that heat is generated or that the material is consumed in the process does not, by itself, convert it into fuel for the purpose of denying credit. Applying that principle, the Court treated the coal and other inputs as raw material used in manufacture and held that the statutory reduction under section 11(3)(b)(iii) was not justified.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the assessee, and the dealer was held entitled to full input tax credit without the reduction applied by the revenue authorities.
Ratio Decidendi: An input that is an ingredient of the manufacturing process and contributes to the end product does not lose its character as raw material merely because it also generates heat or is consumed during production; therefore, input tax credit cannot be reduced on the footing that such input is fuel unless the statutory condition for reduction is satisfied.