Functional use test expands input tax credit for plant, capital goods, and manufacturing inputs in ship-building operations

Dry dock and fit out berth used in ship-building were treated as plant and, therefore, capital goods under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act because they performed an essential functional role in the business; on that basis, input tax credit on cement, steel, sand, concrete and similar construction materials was allowed on a purposive reading of the scheme. LPG and acetylene gas were also accepted as eligible inputs where used in the manufacturing process, as they could not be denied credit merely by being labelled fuel. The resulting position was that the dealer's input tax credit claims were upheld on all the issues addressed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether Dry Dock and Fit Out Berth could be treated as plant and capital goods under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003, so as to qualify the dealer for input tax credit on cement, steel, sand, concrete and similar materials used in their construction; (ii) Whether LPG and acetylene gas were fuel within the meaning of the Act so as to allow input tax credit.

Issue (i): Whether Dry Dock and Fit Out Berth could be treated as plant and capital goods under the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003, so as to qualify the dealer for input tax credit on cement, steel, sand, concrete and similar materials used in their construction?

Analysis: Capital goods were defined as plant and machinery meant for use in manufacture of taxable goods and accounted as capital assets. Applying the functional or user test, the Court held that a dry dock and fit out berth, though immovable, perform an essential role in the assessee's ship-building business and therefore answer the description of plant. Once treated as plant, they also fall within capital goods. The Court further held that materials used to construct such capital goods are eligible for input tax credit on a purposive reading of the provision, because denying credit on the inputs used to create the capital asset would defeat the object of the scheme.

Conclusion: Yes. Dry Dock and Fit Out Berth were held to be plant and capital goods, and input tax credit on the construction materials was held allowable in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether LPG and acetylene gas were fuel within the meaning of the Act so as to allow input tax credit?

Analysis: The Court followed earlier binding decisions holding that where such materials are used in the manufacturing process and function as consumables or raw material for the process, they cannot be denied input tax credit merely by labelling them as fuel. The provision was applied consistently with the existing line of authority on similar inputs used in manufacture.

Conclusion: Yes. LPG and acetylene gas were treated as eligible inputs and the credit claim was allowed in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The tax appeals were held to fail, the dealer's entitlement to input tax credit was upheld on all decided issues, and the challenge by the Revenue did not succeed.

Ratio Decidendi: For purposes of input tax credit, an article or structure used as an essential functional tool in the business may be treated as plant and capital goods, and inputs used to construct such capital goods can qualify for credit when a purposive user-based interpretation of the taxing provision is applied.

---