Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether light fittings, ceiling and pedestal fans, and water pipe fittings used in a hotel were "plant" so as to qualify for development rebate under section 10(2)(vib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The items were used in the assessee's hotel business and were not shown to fall within any specific exclusion in the Act. The fact that they were affixed to the building did not, by itself, deprive them of the character of plant. In the absence of a statutory definition, the ordinary business meaning of plant was applied, namely apparatus employed for carrying on the business. The items were not mere office appliances and therefore did not attract the proviso relied on by the revenue.
Conclusion: The items were plant within section 10(2)(vib) and the assessee was entitled to development rebate on them.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue, with costs.
Ratio Decidendi: Articles or fittings used as business apparatus do not lose their character as plant merely because they are fixed to a building, unless the Act specifically excludes them.