Tax Tribunal decision: Assessee and Revenue appeals partly allowed, with specific directions on various tax issues

The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee's appeal and partly allowed the Revenue's appeal in a case involving various tax issues. The Tribunal directed the AO and TPO to re-examine and make adjustments based on established principles and previous orders, providing specific directions on transfer pricing adjustments, deduction under Section 35D, treatment of foreign exchange fluctuations, depreciation on computer software and servers, computation of deduction under Section 10AA, foreign tax credit, and year-end professional charges.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustments
2. Deduction under Section 35D
3. Foreign Exchange Fluctuations
4. Depreciation on Computer Software
5. Computation of Deduction under Section 10AA
6. Non-grant of Foreign Tax Credit
7. Disallowance of Year-End Professional Charges
8. Depreciation on Servers

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing (TP) Adjustments:
The primary issue was the determination of arm’s length interest rate by the TPO. The assessee received interest on loans given to its AE at 6% p.a., but the TPO adopted a rate of 14.74%. The DRP did not follow its previous year’s order, which directed the AO to adopt interest rates of the loanee country and verify from the 'Loan connector' database. The Tribunal directed the TPO to follow the previous year’s method and examine the ALP on similar lines.

2. Deduction under Section 35D:
The assessee claimed a deduction under Section 35D for expenses incurred during the acquisition of two companies and raising capital through GDR and FCCBs. The AO restricted the claim, but the Tribunal directed the AO to allow the claim as in earlier years, following the Tribunal’s order for AY 2008-09, which recognized FCCBs as debentures eligible for calculation as part of 'capital employed in the business of the company'.

3. Foreign Exchange Fluctuations:
The AO treated foreign exchange losses as speculative, but the Tribunal held that such losses are not contingent or speculative. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the losses as business losses, following the principles established by the Supreme Court in the case of ONGC and the Bombay High Court in Badridas Gauridu (P.) Ltd. The Tribunal also addressed the treatment of unrealized foreign exchange gains on FCCBs, directing the AO to treat these as capital account adjustments.

4. Depreciation on Computer Software:
The AO disallowed depreciation on computer software due to non-deduction of tax at source, but the Tribunal held that Section 40(a)(ia) does not apply to capitalized software purchases. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow depreciation as claimed by the assessee.

5. Computation of Deduction under Section 10AA:
The AO reduced certain expenses from the export turnover for computing the deduction under Section 10AA. The Tribunal directed the AO to exclude only those expenses directly attributable to the delivery of articles or services outside India. The Tribunal also upheld the DRP’s direction to adjust the total turnover accordingly.

6. Non-grant of Foreign Tax Credit:
The assessee claimed a foreign tax credit which was not considered by the AO. The Tribunal directed the AO to examine the FTC entitlement while giving effect to the order of the ITAT, in case there is any taxable income.

7. Disallowance of Year-End Professional Charges:
The AO disallowed year-end professional charges due to non-deduction of tax at source. The DRP accepted the assessee’s contention that the identity of the payee could not be ascertained at the time of provision. However, the Tribunal reversed the DRP’s decision, directing the AO to examine whether the amounts pertain to the unit eligible for Section 10AA deduction and adjust the profits accordingly.

8. Depreciation on Servers:
The AO treated servers as Plant & Machinery instead of computer equipment. The DRP allowed depreciation at the rate applicable to computers. The Tribunal upheld the DRP’s decision, recognizing servers as part of computer equipment.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the assessee’s appeal for statistical purposes and partly allowed the Revenue’s appeal, providing specific directions to the AO and TPO for re-examination and adjustments based on the established principles and previous orders.

---