Satellite expenses not excluded from export turnover for deduction under Income Tax Act

The ITAT held that satellite expenses incurred by the assessee should not be excluded from the export turnover for the purpose of deduction under section 10A of the Income Tax Act. The expenses were deemed not directly attributable to the delivery of goods outside India and were akin to ISP charges, thus not falling under telecommunication charges. As a result, the A.O. was directed to recalculate the deduction without excluding the satellite expenses, leading to the allowance of the assessee's appeal.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Exclusion of satellite expenses from the export turnover for the purpose of deduction under section 10A of the Income Tax Act.
2. Exclusion of satellite expenses from the total turnover if they are to be excluded from the export turnover.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Exclusion of Satellite Expenses from Export Turnover:
The primary issue in this case was whether the satellite expenses incurred by the assessee should be excluded from the export turnover while computing the deduction under section 10A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee argued that the satellite expenses should not be excluded from the export turnover because:
- The expenses were not invoiced to the overseas clients.
- The expenses were fixed charges and not dependent upon usage.
- The expenses were incurred in Indian currency and not in foreign exchange.

The Assessing Officer (A.O.) had treated the satellite link charges as telecommunication charges attributable to the delivery of processed data and excluded them from the export turnover. The CIT(A) upheld this view, leading to the present appeal.

The ITAT referred to the case of Patni Telecom P. Ltd. vs. ITO, where it was held that expenses for Internet Service Provider (ISP) do not come within the scope of telecommunication charges as provided in clause (iv) of Explanation 2 to section 10A. The ITAT noted that the satellite link charges paid by the assessee were similar to ISP expenses and were fixed charges for obtaining effective Internet connectivity, not directly attributable to the delivery of goods outside India. Therefore, these expenses should not be excluded from the export turnover.

2. Exclusion of Satellite Expenses from Total Turnover:
The assessee also argued that if the satellite expenses were to be excluded from the export turnover, they should also be excluded from the total turnover to maintain parity. This argument was based on the principle established in the case of ITO vs. Sak Soft Ltd., where it was held that expenses excluded from the export turnover should also be excluded from the total turnover.

However, since the ITAT concluded that the satellite link charges should not be considered as telecommunication charges and should not be excluded from the export turnover, the alternate contention regarding the exclusion from the total turnover became academic and was not considered.

Conclusion:
The ITAT held that the satellite link charges do not fall within the scope of 'telecommunication charges' as provided in clause (iv) of Explanation 2 to section 10A. Therefore, the A.O. was directed not to exclude these expenses from the export turnover. Consequently, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the A.O. was instructed to recalculate the deduction under section 10A without excluding the satellite expenses from the export turnover.

---