Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the detention and seizure of the betel nuts and the truck carrying them were lawful in the absence of material showing that the goods were of foreign origin or liable to confiscation.
Analysis: The detention initially rested on a suspicion of theft, but the Customs seizure that followed had to satisfy the statutory requirement of a reasonable belief that the goods were smuggled or otherwise liable to confiscation. The record showed contemporaneous transport documents, trade invoices, tax papers, delivery challans and booking papers supporting the petitioners' claim that the goods were lawfully purchased and being transported. The authorities relied mainly on the driver's statement, but it was not shown to have been recorded before a magistrate or supported by any independent material, and there was no trade opinion, expert examination, or other decisive evidence to establish foreign origin. The seizure was also made before the petitioners could respond to the notice fixed for appearance, and the materials on record did not disclose the existence of a legally sustainable basis for invoking the power of seizure.
Conclusion: The detention and seizure were held unsustainable in law and the challenge succeeded.