Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the litigation expenses incurred by the assessee-company in defending a shareholder's suit and in prosecuting the appeal were deductible as expenditure wholly and exclusively laid out for the purpose of its business under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: Expenditure on civil litigation is deductible only if it is incurred by the assessee in its character as a trader and the dispute arises out of, or is incidental to, the carrying on of its business. The suit, though originating in a shareholder dispute, went beyond a mere domestic quarrel and sought reliefs that threatened the company's business and the conduct of its affairs. On that footing, the costs incurred in defending the suit were treated as business expenditure. The appeal, however, related only to the correctness of the ruling given at the general meeting and concerned the relative rights of shareholders and management under the Companies Act in relation to internal procedure. That expenditure had no real connection with the company's business and was incurred only to sustain the ruling of the chairman.
Conclusion: The expenses incurred in defending the suit were allowable, but the expenses incurred in prosecuting the appeal were not allowable as business deduction.