<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (2) TMI 86 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188907</link>
    <description>Litigation expenses are deductible as business expenditure only where they are incurred in the assessee&#039;s character as trader and arise out of, or are incidental to, the carrying on of its business. Costs incurred in defending a shareholder&#039;s suit were treated as allowable because the suit sought reliefs that could threaten the company&#039;s business and affairs, making the dispute sufficiently connected with business operations. By contrast, expenses incurred in prosecuting the appeal were not allowable, as the appeal concerned internal shareholder-management procedure and was incurred only to support the chairman&#039;s ruling, without a real nexus to the company&#039;s business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:08:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (2) TMI 86 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188907</link>
      <description>Litigation expenses are deductible as business expenditure only where they are incurred in the assessee&#039;s character as trader and arise out of, or are incidental to, the carrying on of its business. Costs incurred in defending a shareholder&#039;s suit were treated as allowable because the suit sought reliefs that could threaten the company&#039;s business and affairs, making the dispute sufficiently connected with business operations. By contrast, expenses incurred in prosecuting the appeal were not allowable, as the appeal concerned internal shareholder-management procedure and was incurred only to support the chairman&#039;s ruling, without a real nexus to the company&#039;s business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>